Standards, test methods and code guidance
The PLC develops and maintains the technical framework that underpins reliable, compliant photoluminescent safety systems across Asia-Pacific.
Objective methods for proving product performance
Products must be tested against these PLC methods to demonstrate the longevity, durability and luminance required for safe egress.
HTC (High Temperature Curing) Test
A manufacturing process that ensures photoluminescent products achieve maximum longevity and durability. Products must be tested against the HTC Test Method to qualify.
Download test method (PDF) ↓Daylight Charging Simulation Test
Path markings in a Safe Movement System must provide sufficient luminance. Activation charging exposes products to a D65, 5000 lux light source for 60 minutes.
Download test method (PDF) ↓High Luminance Egress Test
High Luminance systems must sustain luminance long enough for safe evacuation. Charging exposes products to 1 ft-candle (11 lux) at 4000–4500K for 60 minutes.
Download test method (PDF) ↓Photoluminescent technology in the NCC
Part E4 of NCC Volume One covers visibility in an emergency, exit signs and warning systems. The NCC provides pathways for the design and operation of electrically illuminated exit signs, hybrid photoluminescent exit signs and passive photoluminescent exit signs.
NCC 2025 expands the framework of previous versions by recognising hybrid photoluminescent exit signs. These systems use a dedicated light source to energise the photoluminescent panel during normal operation, allowing the sign to remain visible if the normal lighting supply fails.
Hybrid photoluminescent exit signs are addressed through SA TS 5367:2021, which sets requirements for product design, illumination, installation and performance. Passive photoluminescent signs continue to be addressed separately under Specification 25.
Together, these provisions provide clearer pathways for electrical, hybrid and passive photoluminescent exit sign systems. As NCC adoption and transition arrangements are managed by each state and territory, the applicable edition and local variations should be confirmed for each project.
Photoluminescent technology in the NZBC
The New Zealand Building Code addresses photoluminescent egress solutions through Clause F6 Visibility in Escape Routes and Clause F8 Signs.
F6 requires key features of escape routes, including changes in level or direction, stairs, ramps, handrails, obstacles and escape doors, to remain reasonably visible if the main lighting fails. Photoluminescent path markings and related systems may support compliance where their design and performance are appropriately demonstrated.
F8 applies specifically to exit and safety signage. F8/AS1 expressly permits photoluminescent exit signs, subject to requirements for charging illumination, luminance, sign size and viewing distance. These provisions allow photoluminescent route guidance and exit identification to operate together as part of an integrated egress system.
Photoluminescent technology in the Fire Code of the Philippines
The Fire Code of the Philippines and its 2019 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations recognise photoluminescent materials as part of the wider means-of-egress system.
Section 10.2.5.12 focuses on route guidance and exit identification. It requires photoluminescent low-level directional markings leading occupants towards exits, alongside exit signage and egress illumination.
Section 10.2.5.13 focuses on evacuation information. It requires emergency evacuation plans with a photoluminescent background so routes, exits and fire-safety equipment remain visible during a power failure.
Together, these provisions support directional guidance, exit recognition and emergency information. Photoluminescent features supplement, rather than replace, required emergency lighting and remain subject to Bureau of Fire Protection approval.